Monday, February 04, 2008
友人の一日（第三回)
先週の土曜にある駐在員とゴルフをした。でも渋滞した、コースを終えられなかった。コースで待っていた時、何でゴルフは四人でするのか、スループットの観点で一番良いのかと思っていた。グルプの二人のプレイヤーがやめた後で、私達六人が一緒にしてみた。ほかの五人のプレイヤーに注意するのが難しいので、六人のグルプでゴルフをするのが危ないだろうと分かった。
Meaning of life (Part One)
It can be paraphrased by two questions: “why do we exist” and “how should we exist”. Call them the strong and weak anthropic questions, if you will.
First, the strong anthropic question: Why do we exist?
Science may have set out to find the answer, but the scientific method is never designed to reveal the motivation behind any physical phenomenon. While most cosmologists are confident in describing the universe a few seconds after the Big Bang and thereafter, no Friedmann models try to answer why there was even a Big Bang. When we successfully establish the unified theory of physics in the near future, it probably won’t tell us what “breathes fire” into those equations, as commented by the impressive Stephen Hawking. Science is designed to answer “how we exist” but not “why we exist”.
Wherever science fails to respond, religion thrives. Explaining the purpose of life has always been the first and last frontier of any religion.
The Abrahamic God is said to be perfect. Yet humans were created in order to serve Elohim or Yahweh, to love the Lord, and to worship Allah. The fact that human actions are required upon Him means that He needs something and is not complete. The definition of “perfect” is “lacking nothing essential to the whole; complete of its nature or kind”. If we take the Scriptures literally, the motivation for Creation is confusing at best.
The Vedic and Puranic cosmology of Hinduism is probably the most scientifically comparable in all ancient civilizations. While the Hebrew universe lasts 6000 years, and the Chinese cosmos, a few tens of thousands more, the Hindu scriptures revealed a stunning scale of 4 billion years. Its creation-destruction cycle of Yuga corresponds to the theory of Big Bang, Expansion-Contraction and Big Crunch. The ultimate goal in a Hindu’s life is to achieve moksha from samsāra so that the ātmā, could unite itself with Brahman. Some Hindus believe that ātmā and Brahman are indistinguishable, and the detachment is caused by māyā. The existence of humans and its purpose is nothing more than a cosmic game of the divine. The forward path to overcome māyā and samsāra resembles that of a pawn in chess to reach the end zone so that it can be promoted.
Inheriting the tradition of kárma and samsāra, the dharmic protégé Buddha didn’t offer anything new to explain the meaning of life. In fact, Buddha refused to answer the question to the origin of the universe and life, because he thought it was irrelevant to a Buddhist’s quest: nirvana, a slight different form of moksha.
In Taoism, Tao, like Om, neither being nor non-being, gives birth to everything. Its indescribable mysticism in creation eludes its purpose. Although it stands out from the rest childish creation stories in ancient China, it offers no real insight as why there was even one.
So far, no single theory can satisfy the strong anthropic question. Therefore, I seek comfort in three working theories about the purpose of our existence:
1) There is no purpose. Life on this remote corner of the universe is a pure accident explainable by the Uncertainty Principle. God does play dices after all.
2) Humans were created to fulfill some unrevealed purpose, but the watchmaker walked away. Gott ist tot. The physical laws may still function, but the absolute morality no longer applies.
3) “God is a mean kid over an anthill with a magnifying glass”. The concept of cosmic game could potentially explain everything. Yet it renders the meaning of life meaningless. We are nothing but puppets to satisfy some sadistic perversion.
First, the strong anthropic question: Why do we exist?
Science may have set out to find the answer, but the scientific method is never designed to reveal the motivation behind any physical phenomenon. While most cosmologists are confident in describing the universe a few seconds after the Big Bang and thereafter, no Friedmann models try to answer why there was even a Big Bang. When we successfully establish the unified theory of physics in the near future, it probably won’t tell us what “breathes fire” into those equations, as commented by the impressive Stephen Hawking. Science is designed to answer “how we exist” but not “why we exist”.
Wherever science fails to respond, religion thrives. Explaining the purpose of life has always been the first and last frontier of any religion.
The Abrahamic God is said to be perfect. Yet humans were created in order to serve Elohim or Yahweh, to love the Lord, and to worship Allah. The fact that human actions are required upon Him means that He needs something and is not complete. The definition of “perfect” is “lacking nothing essential to the whole; complete of its nature or kind”. If we take the Scriptures literally, the motivation for Creation is confusing at best.
The Vedic and Puranic cosmology of Hinduism is probably the most scientifically comparable in all ancient civilizations. While the Hebrew universe lasts 6000 years, and the Chinese cosmos, a few tens of thousands more, the Hindu scriptures revealed a stunning scale of 4 billion years. Its creation-destruction cycle of Yuga corresponds to the theory of Big Bang, Expansion-Contraction and Big Crunch. The ultimate goal in a Hindu’s life is to achieve moksha from samsāra so that the ātmā, could unite itself with Brahman. Some Hindus believe that ātmā and Brahman are indistinguishable, and the detachment is caused by māyā. The existence of humans and its purpose is nothing more than a cosmic game of the divine. The forward path to overcome māyā and samsāra resembles that of a pawn in chess to reach the end zone so that it can be promoted.
Inheriting the tradition of kárma and samsāra, the dharmic protégé Buddha didn’t offer anything new to explain the meaning of life. In fact, Buddha refused to answer the question to the origin of the universe and life, because he thought it was irrelevant to a Buddhist’s quest: nirvana, a slight different form of moksha.
In Taoism, Tao, like Om, neither being nor non-being, gives birth to everything. Its indescribable mysticism in creation eludes its purpose. Although it stands out from the rest childish creation stories in ancient China, it offers no real insight as why there was even one.
So far, no single theory can satisfy the strong anthropic question. Therefore, I seek comfort in three working theories about the purpose of our existence:
1) There is no purpose. Life on this remote corner of the universe is a pure accident explainable by the Uncertainty Principle. God does play dices after all.
2) Humans were created to fulfill some unrevealed purpose, but the watchmaker walked away. Gott ist tot. The physical laws may still function, but the absolute morality no longer applies.
3) “God is a mean kid over an anthill with a magnifying glass”. The concept of cosmic game could potentially explain everything. Yet it renders the meaning of life meaningless. We are nothing but puppets to satisfy some sadistic perversion.
Friday, February 01, 2008
Guilty As Charged
I went to a traffic court yesterday, not to confront my accuser but to ask for court’s leniency. I was cited about four months ago for driving in a carpool lane during restricted hours. Guilty as charged, I accepted the consequence. Aware that I could go to court and ask for a fine reduction, I booked a trial date.
I arrived early yesterday. When I saw a stern and sharp looking guy in suite walk into the courtroom, I thought that was the citing officer. I was convinced he must have been thinking what a dishonorable person I was who wanted to contest a known fact. I felt bad for his misjudgment of me. A few minutes later, I found out that serious looking guy was just another defendant. Then I started to look around for the officer. When I was pulled over, I didn’t even get a good look at him because I was ready just to take the ticket and leave. My officer didn't show up.
So my case was dismissed for lack of prosecution. I will get my bail money of $396 back in 4 to 6 weeks.
But I wasn’t happy about the unexpected favorable outcome.
If we could get away with things, we would do anything, lying, cheating, stealing, to maximize our own benefit. Two things keep us in check: guilt and shame. We fear of judgment, terrestrial or celestial. Western legal system and religious morality are designed to create the sense of guilt and sin in us. Eastern philosophy invokes shame. Fear for disgrace and embarrassment can be just as powerful.
Yesterday I felt ashamed for what the officer might have thought of me. I was declared innocent but was still guilty. On the way out, a thought occurred to me that in court, I should’ve admitted my guilt, despite the absence of my accuser, and still asked for leniency. But I didn’t have the courage to do it then, and doubt I would have the courage to do so in the future. I guess my clear conscience has a minimum market value of $396.
I arrived early yesterday. When I saw a stern and sharp looking guy in suite walk into the courtroom, I thought that was the citing officer. I was convinced he must have been thinking what a dishonorable person I was who wanted to contest a known fact. I felt bad for his misjudgment of me. A few minutes later, I found out that serious looking guy was just another defendant. Then I started to look around for the officer. When I was pulled over, I didn’t even get a good look at him because I was ready just to take the ticket and leave. My officer didn't show up.
So my case was dismissed for lack of prosecution. I will get my bail money of $396 back in 4 to 6 weeks.
But I wasn’t happy about the unexpected favorable outcome.
If we could get away with things, we would do anything, lying, cheating, stealing, to maximize our own benefit. Two things keep us in check: guilt and shame. We fear of judgment, terrestrial or celestial. Western legal system and religious morality are designed to create the sense of guilt and sin in us. Eastern philosophy invokes shame. Fear for disgrace and embarrassment can be just as powerful.
Yesterday I felt ashamed for what the officer might have thought of me. I was declared innocent but was still guilty. On the way out, a thought occurred to me that in court, I should’ve admitted my guilt, despite the absence of my accuser, and still asked for leniency. But I didn’t have the courage to do it then, and doubt I would have the courage to do so in the future. I guess my clear conscience has a minimum market value of $396.
Religious Fundamentalists
People always associate religious fundamentalists with terrorists and fanatics. However, if you really think about it, any devout religious person must be a fundamentalist.
When reading the scripture, the devoted must take it literally and accept its totality. One can’t interpret it according to his own likings. Nor can he pick and choose whichever suits him well. Otherwise, he is a religious opportunist. When one denies one part of the scriptures, it’s corollary that one can deny any part thereof. That’s the beginning of the end of his faith.
So there is no such term called religious fundamentalism. If you are truly religious, you have to be a fundamentalist.
When reading the scripture, the devoted must take it literally and accept its totality. One can’t interpret it according to his own likings. Nor can he pick and choose whichever suits him well. Otherwise, he is a religious opportunist. When one denies one part of the scriptures, it’s corollary that one can deny any part thereof. That’s the beginning of the end of his faith.
So there is no such term called religious fundamentalism. If you are truly religious, you have to be a fundamentalist.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)